Cancer: the Price of Peace?

-

Once home, many of our soldiers who served in Iraq have to battle chronic rashes, tumors and even cancer.

The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) is demanding to know why. Why did the giant contractor KBR knowingly expose our forces to carcinogenic toxins at its power plants in Iraq?

KBR, the largest non-union construction company in the United States, has struck gold in its massive contracts with the U.S. government, raking in $17 billion in Iraq-related work since 2003.

The former Halliburton subsidiary has relied on both military and non-military personnel to protect its workers, including 16 Indiana Guardsmen who are now suing the defense contractor, accusing the company of being aware it was exposing them to cancer-causing chemicals. The Guardsmen, who suffered a myriad of health problems since coming home (one died from lung cancer), claim KBR managers “downplayed and disregarded” the risk from contamination at their site. KBR denies any wrongdoing.

“The situation…may just be the tip of the iceberg,” observes IAVA Executive Director Paul Rieckhoff. His nonpartisan agency wants Congress to take action and request the contractor to testify about its knowledge of toxic exposure.

Meantime, Indiana Senator Evan Bayh has vowed to reintroduce legislation to create a medical registry for military personnel exposed to toxins. It would track service members exposed during wartime service and guarantee them access to priority care at VA hospitals. Bayh says the registry is modeled after our government’s response to Agent Orange during the Vietnam conflict. Veterans suffering can cut through the red tape and get the treatment they need.

IAVA has been lobbying for such a registry. “This latest example of toxic exposure underlines the urgency,” says Rieckhoff, who founded this first organization of Iraq and Afghanistan vets in 2004 and now boasts more than 125,000 veteran and civilian supporters.

Image: Army.mil

Sponsored Content:

DISCUSSION

4 thoughts on “Cancer: the Price of Peace?

  1. Why is anyone worried about Army cancer? Im sick of hearing about cancer. Who cares! The world has too many people alreadey even Ted Turner think so. Besides people look better than they ever did before so why so focused on cancer? I live near LA and there are a TON of hotties everywhere. Every party i see now…. Geezus the people look so HOT…even the girls are totally fuc.kable! Mozzletoff Khloe Kardash and her hubby Lamar on their new show which premiers this spring on E! Has anyone seen her new tattoo? THey are DEFINITELY a hollywood power couple

  2. My 29 year old nephew was just diagnosed with lung cancer and a mass was found in his stomach. He has always been a non smoker, but he was stationed in northern Iraq for a time. He is married with 2 beautiful little girls and is now facing uncertainty. Family believe it is linked to his service in Iraq. Please keep Paul in your prayers.

  3. Great article, Luanne. And very unsettling.

    Making companies (and governments) culpable for the effects of exposure to war-waging chemicals is very provocative – right in the face of the “end justifies the means” ethos of all-out war (not suggesting that’s always the approach, but it’s been known).

    Also, once this beds in, I’ll be interested to see how military authorities react to anything that could potentially get in the way of a soldier carrying out his orders (ie. if you strongly suspect you will be exposed to potentially lethal toxins and your orders are to do just that, how should you react?).

  4. Men and women being used as guinea pigs for the government is just wonderful.
    What is wrong with this country?!
    At least somebody (the IAVA) is trying to make government accountable.

 

Submit a comment:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>