Space: Why Bother?

Shuttle

Is space worth it?

Another year, another whirl of astronautical triumphs and failures, all at the taxpayer’s expense. With environmental problems already testing us to our limits, do we really need to go in search of the mysteries of the universe?

Not Worth It

Space eats money. The technical challenges of space exploration, particularly the manned variety, are such that any extraterrestrial venture is fabulously expensive. NASA’s 2007 budget? $16 billion. Accompanying this massive outlay is the failure rate. Space is the most hostile environment we know of – yet we’re launching super-expensive machinery into it, hoping everything will be fine. All too often, it isn’t. India has recently lost an £80m lunar probe. NASA lost both its Mars Surveyor spacecraft in 1998, at a cost of $125m. It’s a bottomless black hole. Why keep trying to fill it?

Space Can’t Solve Our Problems. “Spread humanity into space” goes the argument, but when only the richest reach the stars, it’s surely a nonsense idea. How exactly does this help our worsening overpopulation problem? It makes sense in the long run – but first things first, we have a planet to save.

Space Is Too Damn Big. The number of discovered exoplanets (“those outside the solar system”) now exceeds 400, with more popping into view every month. But in a practical sense, this is meaningless. They’re just too far away to ever go there. Not for nothing is space described as the “final frontier”: the distances are impossibly vast. When the best imagined speed to the nearest star results in a century’s travel-time (one way), you can be sure E.T. won’t be popping by for candy anytime soon.

Worth It

Space Is A Bargain. The work that NASA did with its relatively paltry $19b budget in 2009 is simply amazing. Sound like a lot? Compare it with the cost of the Iraq War ($10b a month) or GDP ($13 trillion+). Considering how tough it is to work in space, it’s terrific value for money. And the space program isn’t a drain – it generates revenue, creates jobs and stimulates many industries. Space exploration is investment at home. Without it, many technologies we take for granted probably wouldn’t exist. (Not Velcro – that’s a myth).

Space Is How We Fix Our Own Planet. Remember the incredible image of Earth-rise (shown below), described by photographer Galen Rowell as “the most influential environmental photograph ever taken”? That’s a gift the space program has bestowed upon us – ecological self-awareness. We know how fragile our world is because we can see it, bright and alive against the backdrop of the most profound emptiness we know. The help to our planet is technological, too: For example, you may have heard of a little invention developed for spacecraft called solar panels.

We Are Too Small. In July 1994, the remnants of comet Shoemaker-Levy smacked into Jupiter. Some of the holes left in its atmosphere were bigger than the Earth. Forget cheesy Bruce Willis films: it’s scientific fact that we’re a celestial sitting duck and it’s only a matter of time. It’s true we can’t move entire populations, but we can colonize other worlds (in theory) and as a species, give ourselves a fighting chance. Yet it’s not just raw survival instinct that should propel us towards the stars – it’s the fact that we’re human, and it’s what we do. We’re pioneers. It’s why we left the trees, why we crossed the oceans, how the proverbial West was won. Without exploration, we stagnate. Exploring space is how we can remain ourselves.

earthrise

Images: ‘J’, Bill Anders


Subscribe

DISCUSSION

  • Lora K.
    February 25th, 2010 at 2:15 PM

    Space is worth it. Even if there are imperfections to the way we go about studying space, that can be improved. The cost of not learning about it is too high. Imagine if someone said sea exploration wasn’t worth it? Here’s to hoping Branson and NASA / MIT etc. figure out a way to make space travel, exploration and studies totally green! Cheers (raises glass of rocket fuel to ya)!

  • Ted Brady
    March 1st, 2010 at 2:14 PM

    Naww. Space is NOT worth it as we do it. Our active space program has given us Spam (the meat kind), dangerous Teflon(TM) and Tang orange-style juice drink. Oh, and also a whole lot of military technology that so far is fired at mostly brown people who live on top of our strategic oil reserves.

    With the exception of the Hubble Telescope, perhaps nothing that we have built and shot into space should have been done. Humanity cannot afford it and the US certainly can’t.

  • Ted Brady
    March 1st, 2010 at 2:26 PM

    . . . . And another thing. Homo Sapiens are a part of Earth; we emerge from the very molecular structure of Earth. We are not visitors who can just move to another galaxy far, far away.

    Humans moving away from Sun to another star is absurd folly. The Sooner we forget about it and start acting accordingly the better the chances are for our great grandchildren to survive to age 20.

  • Mike
    March 2nd, 2010 at 6:43 PM

    Lora –

    Cheers. :)

    And that’s the challenge, yes. When space travel isn’t reliant on massive amounts of fossil fuels just to get off the ground, we’re onto a winner.

    For that reason, I’m a big fan of the highly speculative “space elevator” concept, little more than solid science fiction at the moment but with a firm grounding in hard science – a mindboggling long cable connected to a large body in low orbit, so spacecraft don’t have to waste fuel getting out of Earth’s gravity well:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator

    When we have one of those, spacecraft can just be physically hauled up and we don’t need millions of tons of exploding fuel to do it.

    But at the moment, pipe dreams. We’re a long way off that yet!

  • Mike
    March 2nd, 2010 at 6:46 PM

    Ted –

    Thanks for commenting. :)

    So do you believe that human beings are going about getting into space the wrong way, or that they shouldn’t even try? (The first comment seems to suggest the former, the second comment the latter).

    And why do you think human beings couldn’t relocate to a sufficiently Earthlike planet somewhere else?