Making companies (and governments) culpable for the effects of exposure to war-waging chemicals is very provocative – right in the face of the “end justifies the means” ethos of all-out war (not suggesting that’s always the approach, but it’s been known).

Also, once this beds in, I’ll be interested to see how military authorities react to anything that could potentially get in the way of a soldier carrying out his orders (ie. if you strongly suspect you will be exposed to potentially lethal toxins and your orders are to do just that, how should you react?).