<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counting the Cost of Pixels</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Niltiac Files &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter Updates for 2009-06-17</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/#comment-3468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Niltiac Files &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter Updates for 2009-06-17]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=7107#comment-3468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] It&#8217;s also not true. The physicist quoted in that story said he was misquoted. http://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/ in reply to Harkaway [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s also not true. The physicist quoted in that story said he was misquoted. <a href="http://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/" rel="nofollow">http://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/</a> in reply to Harkaway [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sowden</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/counting-the-cost-of-pixels/#comment-3467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Sowden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=7107#comment-3467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff, Caitlin. And I agree, these are questions that need to be asked.

The Google story touches on one very important issue - screens. A goodly amount  of a computer&#039;s power is spent making the screen bright enough to read. Same for gadgets - I&#039;ve recently discovered that my turning the brightness down on my smartphone&#039;s screen, I can extend the battery life by hours.

My day job is at a University, and in the evening I walk past rooms filled with banks of computers with many glowing screens - yes, the screensavers are running, but they&#039;re still lit, presumably because they&#039;ve recently been used.

The person who invents an energy-effective way of turning a screen on and off will do wonders for greening up IT. Perhaps screens could be designed to instantly turn themselves off when you&#039;ve finished with them - maybe based on proximity to the computer. Want to turn the screen off? Just back away. That would stop monitors and TFTs blazing away while people are having their tea-breaks, lunches and all the other activities that interrupt a day at the computer. It would take some getting used to, but the energy saving would surely be colossal....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, Caitlin. And I agree, these are questions that need to be asked.</p>
<p>The Google story touches on one very important issue &#8211; screens. A goodly amount  of a computer&#8217;s power is spent making the screen bright enough to read. Same for gadgets &#8211; I&#8217;ve recently discovered that my turning the brightness down on my smartphone&#8217;s screen, I can extend the battery life by hours.</p>
<p>My day job is at a University, and in the evening I walk past rooms filled with banks of computers with many glowing screens &#8211; yes, the screensavers are running, but they&#8217;re still lit, presumably because they&#8217;ve recently been used.</p>
<p>The person who invents an energy-effective way of turning a screen on and off will do wonders for greening up IT. Perhaps screens could be designed to instantly turn themselves off when you&#8217;ve finished with them &#8211; maybe based on proximity to the computer. Want to turn the screen off? Just back away. That would stop monitors and TFTs blazing away while people are having their tea-breaks, lunches and all the other activities that interrupt a day at the computer. It would take some getting used to, but the energy saving would surely be colossal&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-02 13:59:52 by W3 Total Cache
-->