<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA&#8217;s Celestial Sin: Bombing the Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stone4life54</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-38588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stone4life54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-38588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s what you call the mark of Cain...666!!! The mark of Cain is pride. Pride caused him to use his advanced knowledge of Earths energy grid and precious mineral deposits to create a global network of control. This earth grid called,&quot;sacred geometry&quot;, are high energy vortices  sites that line up with celestial bodies. And his clan have used that knowledge to create a line of site, satelite, grid called the &quot;WWW&quot; which they will use to mark, catalog and monitor every human on the planet........NWO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what you call the mark of Cain&#8230;666!!! The mark of Cain is pride. Pride caused him to use his advanced knowledge of Earths energy grid and precious mineral deposits to create a global network of control. This earth grid called,&#8221;sacred geometry&#8221;, are high energy vortices  sites that line up with celestial bodies. And his clan have used that knowledge to create a line of site, satelite, grid called the &#8220;WWW&#8221; which they will use to mark, catalog and monitor every human on the planet&#8230;&#8230;..NWO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Ost</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sara Ost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to make this clear to our readers, this posts represents the views of the author only, and not the editorial board or publisher. Thanks. Ed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to make this clear to our readers, this posts represents the views of the author only, and not the editorial board or publisher. Thanks. Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK it is all starting to make sense now...

Obama getting the nobel peace prize the same day America bombs the moon? The irony is not conincidental, it is actually right on schedule...


Obama is an antizionist, that much has been clear since his administration has taken over, his war on the conservative movement is on the verge of being unprecedented, considering how his department of homeland security has made Christians out to be a national security threat among other facets of the conservative movement, then there is the polar shift in our relationship to Israel. 


The change in tone, as far as where the vibe of the Whitehouse is coming from, considering the targets of this nations crosshairs have been polarized to the point where the former targets have now been victimized to the point of making those formerly targeting them the demonized targets: IE the CIA. 


The devil is in the details, and the details reak with our former allies being transformed by our current allies... We today stand at a flashpoint that is not only visible in the heavens but on the earth. 


Now Obama is declared a nobel peace prize winner the same day we bomb the moon? What does it mean?


America just bombed the moon: A HEAVENLY BODY~!! By definition this is a declaratin of war, but with whom? Are we now officially at war with heaven? We just bombed a heavenly body is it fair to say that Obama has now officially gone to war with God himself?


Obama is a radical beyond the extremes, and imaginations of most Americans who are waking from their sleep. Think about it, if you where a psycho, and wanted to go to war with the God of the Heavens what better way to declare your intent, and what better way to do it, if it was in your power to do so, than to bomb the nearest heavenly body, the moon itself: there is no symbolism to it. 


Fact is we are right on pace with biblical prophecy, the end time world leader will lead the world into war with God himself. You can ignore prophecy all you like, but when we are on pace with it, ignoring it takes a lot more effort... This is a bold and radical step that aims to bring mankind one step closer to being the ultimate authority over itself, but in order to do so, Zion needs to be eradicated off of the face of the earth, so that nothing can stand between man rather than the God of creation, being the authority over mankind in the world. 


As I write this, the war to remove the Zionists from even praying near the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, is in full force by Muslim clerics who are urging an uprising of arabs to wage war with Zionists who dare to pray at the actual wall of temple mount they built. 


It is official, America according to Obama is no longer a Christian nation, it has actually gone as far as to go to war with the God of creation by bombing the moon. Mankind now has finally emerged on the precipice of being the ultimate authority over itself, while acknowledging Obama as the winner of this peace proccess. 



Obama&#039;s former mentor for 20 years and former Muslim, Rev. Wright has a mentor, James Cone. James preaches that God must be killed.


&quot; If God is not for us, and against the white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.&quot; James Cone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK it is all starting to make sense now&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama getting the nobel peace prize the same day America bombs the moon? The irony is not conincidental, it is actually right on schedule&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama is an antizionist, that much has been clear since his administration has taken over, his war on the conservative movement is on the verge of being unprecedented, considering how his department of homeland security has made Christians out to be a national security threat among other facets of the conservative movement, then there is the polar shift in our relationship to Israel. </p>
<p>The change in tone, as far as where the vibe of the Whitehouse is coming from, considering the targets of this nations crosshairs have been polarized to the point where the former targets have now been victimized to the point of making those formerly targeting them the demonized targets: IE the CIA. </p>
<p>The devil is in the details, and the details reak with our former allies being transformed by our current allies&#8230; We today stand at a flashpoint that is not only visible in the heavens but on the earth. </p>
<p>Now Obama is declared a nobel peace prize winner the same day we bomb the moon? What does it mean?</p>
<p>America just bombed the moon: A HEAVENLY BODY~!! By definition this is a declaratin of war, but with whom? Are we now officially at war with heaven? We just bombed a heavenly body is it fair to say that Obama has now officially gone to war with God himself?</p>
<p>Obama is a radical beyond the extremes, and imaginations of most Americans who are waking from their sleep. Think about it, if you where a psycho, and wanted to go to war with the God of the Heavens what better way to declare your intent, and what better way to do it, if it was in your power to do so, than to bomb the nearest heavenly body, the moon itself: there is no symbolism to it. </p>
<p>Fact is we are right on pace with biblical prophecy, the end time world leader will lead the world into war with God himself. You can ignore prophecy all you like, but when we are on pace with it, ignoring it takes a lot more effort&#8230; This is a bold and radical step that aims to bring mankind one step closer to being the ultimate authority over itself, but in order to do so, Zion needs to be eradicated off of the face of the earth, so that nothing can stand between man rather than the God of creation, being the authority over mankind in the world. </p>
<p>As I write this, the war to remove the Zionists from even praying near the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, is in full force by Muslim clerics who are urging an uprising of arabs to wage war with Zionists who dare to pray at the actual wall of temple mount they built. </p>
<p>It is official, America according to Obama is no longer a Christian nation, it has actually gone as far as to go to war with the God of creation by bombing the moon. Mankind now has finally emerged on the precipice of being the ultimate authority over itself, while acknowledging Obama as the winner of this peace proccess. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s former mentor for 20 years and former Muslim, Rev. Wright has a mentor, James Cone. James preaches that God must be killed.</p>
<p>&#8221; If God is not for us, and against the white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.&#8221; James Cone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirsty</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirsty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I could be wrong but I thought I had read somewhere that:

Doesn&#039;t the moon have some kind of fundamental effect on the tilt and spin on the earth,  and therefore our whole climate, length of our day, and seasons??


and of course the tides?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong but I thought I had read somewhere that:</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the moon have some kind of fundamental effect on the tilt and spin on the earth,  and therefore our whole climate, length of our day, and seasons??</p>
<p>and of course the tides?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Sylvester</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Sylvester]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2242295/nasa_firing_lcross_missile_into_the.html

Try reading this and learning something. Nobody is thinking of bringing water back to the Earth. Finding it on the moon, on the other hand, means that water doesn&#039;t have to be taken from Earth to support colonies on the moon someday. There is no eco damage to the moon from this that is any worse that writing your name in the sand on the beach. There are enough real environmental issues without making stuff up. Focus, people, focus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2242295/nasa_firing_lcross_missile_into_the.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2242295/nasa_firing_lcross_missile_into_the.html</a></p>
<p>Try reading this and learning something. Nobody is thinking of bringing water back to the Earth. Finding it on the moon, on the other hand, means that water doesn&#8217;t have to be taken from Earth to support colonies on the moon someday. There is no eco damage to the moon from this that is any worse that writing your name in the sand on the beach. There are enough real environmental issues without making stuff up. Focus, people, focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what gave you the impression we&#039;d be shuttling water back to Earth, but I&#039;ll say that assumption is as ridiculous as the prospect itself. And this isn&#039;t a conquest. It&#039;s a science experiment. So when we&#039;ve let corporations poison the Earth to a point of no return in the future, at least we&#039;ll have somewhere else to go. Lobbying humanity to help itself, in my opinion, is a near waste of time. At what point were we ever in really good shape than when we&#039;ve set out on scientific exploration? Science should lead the way. It&#039;s our advancement through reason and logic (not something we&#039;re usually good for).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what gave you the impression we&#8217;d be shuttling water back to Earth, but I&#8217;ll say that assumption is as ridiculous as the prospect itself. And this isn&#8217;t a conquest. It&#8217;s a science experiment. So when we&#8217;ve let corporations poison the Earth to a point of no return in the future, at least we&#8217;ll have somewhere else to go. Lobbying humanity to help itself, in my opinion, is a near waste of time. At what point were we ever in really good shape than when we&#8217;ve set out on scientific exploration? Science should lead the way. It&#8217;s our advancement through reason and logic (not something we&#8217;re usually good for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo Farrant</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugo Farrant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 09:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this clip exploring the issues

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npRste0fgAI

much love]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this clip exploring the issues</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npRste0fgAI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npRste0fgAI</a></p>
<p>much love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s also the problem of arguments against space exploration being of the either/or variety. Either we save the planet or we go into space. Either we pour money into the environment or we build better rockets. 

But the space programme is a vanishingly small amount compared to, say, the recent financial bailouts, or the US Army defense budget. We *can* do both, and we are doing both. We just need to put more money into both (and less money into the things that matter less).

Re. &quot;Let&#039;s fix Earth&#039;s problems first&quot;...
If we say to ourselves that we will only go into space when our planet is fixed, we will never go into space. We will always find something more we can do here. There will always be problems. The trick is managing them enough to keep our world healthy - but our planet will never be perfect.

Another reason not going spacewards worries me is because the natural world is unsympathetic to species that back themselves into a corner. We&#039;re on just the one planet, in a region of space regularly bypassed by large chunks of rock that could instantly render our planet uninhabitable to us if they strayed off course. This is fact, and this is the natural world in action. (Just look at Jupiter recently: http://jupiter.samba.org/ ).

Is it an eco-sin to want to stay alive?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also the problem of arguments against space exploration being of the either/or variety. Either we save the planet or we go into space. Either we pour money into the environment or we build better rockets. </p>
<p>But the space programme is a vanishingly small amount compared to, say, the recent financial bailouts, or the US Army defense budget. We *can* do both, and we are doing both. We just need to put more money into both (and less money into the things that matter less).</p>
<p>Re. &#8220;Let&#8217;s fix Earth&#8217;s problems first&#8221;&#8230;<br />
If we say to ourselves that we will only go into space when our planet is fixed, we will never go into space. We will always find something more we can do here. There will always be problems. The trick is managing them enough to keep our world healthy &#8211; but our planet will never be perfect.</p>
<p>Another reason not going spacewards worries me is because the natural world is unsympathetic to species that back themselves into a corner. We&#8217;re on just the one planet, in a region of space regularly bypassed by large chunks of rock that could instantly render our planet uninhabitable to us if they strayed off course. This is fact, and this is the natural world in action. (Just look at Jupiter recently: <a href="http://jupiter.samba.org/" rel="nofollow">http://jupiter.samba.org/</a> ).</p>
<p>Is it an eco-sin to want to stay alive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, re-reading my commit I wasn&#039;t very clear. I wasn&#039;t talking about the Earth at all, which obviously should be preserved for the benefit of future generations, as well as the other species that we share it with. However, neither of these arguments apply to the Moon. There is no life there, and we both agree there isn&#039;t going to be on a timescale that is meaningful. NASA does a lot of good work preserving our planet, including climate change research, air quality analysis, education, near-earth collision research, to name but a few. To say they are committing an &#039;eco-sin&#039; is a bit sensationalist and misrepresents what they do for all of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, re-reading my commit I wasn&#8217;t very clear. I wasn&#8217;t talking about the Earth at all, which obviously should be preserved for the benefit of future generations, as well as the other species that we share it with. However, neither of these arguments apply to the Moon. There is no life there, and we both agree there isn&#8217;t going to be on a timescale that is meaningful. NASA does a lot of good work preserving our planet, including climate change research, air quality analysis, education, near-earth collision research, to name but a few. To say they are committing an &#8216;eco-sin&#8217; is a bit sensationalist and misrepresents what they do for all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/nasa-bomb-moon-water/#comment-6052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wendy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=24282#comment-6052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yhe alleged water-seeking and lunar colonization experiment, is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies.  The NASA moon bombing, a component of the LCROSS mission, may also trigger conflict with known extraterrestrial civilizations on the moon as reported on the moon in witnessed statements by U.S. astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, and in witnessed statements to NSA (National Security Agency) photos and documents regarding an extraterrestrial base on the dark side of the moon.  

If the true intent of the LCROSS mission moon bombing is a hostile act by NASA against known extraterrestrial civilizations and settlements on the moon, then NASA and by extension the U.S. government are guilty of aggressive war which is the most serious of war crimes under the U.N. Charter and the Geneva Conventions, to which the U.S. is subject.  The U.N. Outer Space Treaty, which the U.S. has ratified, requires that &quot; The moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to the Treaty exclusively for peaceful purposes. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.&quot;  98 nations have ratified and 125 nations have signed the U.N. Outer Space Treaty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yhe alleged water-seeking and lunar colonization experiment, is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies.  The NASA moon bombing, a component of the LCROSS mission, may also trigger conflict with known extraterrestrial civilizations on the moon as reported on the moon in witnessed statements by U.S. astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, and in witnessed statements to NSA (National Security Agency) photos and documents regarding an extraterrestrial base on the dark side of the moon.  </p>
<p>If the true intent of the LCROSS mission moon bombing is a hostile act by NASA against known extraterrestrial civilizations and settlements on the moon, then NASA and by extension the U.S. government are guilty of aggressive war which is the most serious of war crimes under the U.N. Charter and the Geneva Conventions, to which the U.S. is subject.  The U.N. Outer Space Treaty, which the U.S. has ratified, requires that &#8221; The moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to the Treaty exclusively for peaceful purposes. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.&#8221;  98 nations have ratified and 125 nations have signed the U.N. Outer Space Treaty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-03 05:03:15 by W3 Total Cache
-->