Comments on: Sex By Numbers: Good for a Man, Good For a Woman? https://ecosalon.com/sex-by-numbers-good-for-a-man-good-for-a-woman/ Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:51:01 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25 By: Rosie Spinks https://ecosalon.com/sex-by-numbers-good-for-a-man-good-for-a-woman/#comment-43308 Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:19:17 +0000 http://ecosalon.com/?p=133817#comment-43308 Hello Carla.

Rosie the SBN author here. Thanks for spotting that! You’re absolutely correct. My screen-weary eyes didn’t catch that the “t” and the “c” were in different places

]]> By: Mike4891 https://ecosalon.com/sex-by-numbers-good-for-a-man-good-for-a-woman/#comment-43258 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:34:02 +0000 http://ecosalon.com/?p=133817#comment-43258 What a Catch-22 in theorizing that over-sexulized culture is “to blame” for asexual persons. Isn’t that a cultural assumption in itself? Or his point that only 1% might be considered too low? I don’t think anyone should deny existing desires, but where no desire exists, who complains?

]]> By: Carla https://ecosalon.com/sex-by-numbers-good-for-a-man-good-for-a-woman/#comment-43252 Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:25:22 +0000 http://ecosalon.com/?p=133817#comment-43252 I think you may mean oxytocin, the “love hormone.” Oxycontin is a narcotic pain reliever. Although that would probably help combat depression as well. 😉

]]>