<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space: Why Bother?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/#comment-12559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=33828#comment-12559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted - 

Thanks for commenting. :)

So do you believe that human beings are going about getting into space the wrong way, or that they shouldn&#039;t even try? (The first comment seems to suggest the former, the second comment the latter).

And why do you think human beings couldn&#039;t relocate to a sufficiently Earthlike planet somewhere else?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted &#8211; </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting. 🙂</p>
<p>So do you believe that human beings are going about getting into space the wrong way, or that they shouldn&#8217;t even try? (The first comment seems to suggest the former, the second comment the latter).</p>
<p>And why do you think human beings couldn&#8217;t relocate to a sufficiently Earthlike planet somewhere else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/#comment-12558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=33828#comment-12558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lora - 

Cheers. :) 

And that&#039;s the challenge, yes. When space travel isn&#039;t reliant on massive amounts of fossil fuels just to get off the ground, we&#039;re onto a winner.

For that reason, I&#039;m a big fan of the highly speculative &quot;space elevator&quot; concept, little more than solid science fiction at the moment but with a firm grounding in hard science - a mindboggling long cable connected to a large body in low orbit, so spacecraft don&#039;t have to waste fuel getting out of Earth&#039;s gravity well: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator

When we have one of those, spacecraft can just be physically hauled up and we don&#039;t need millions of tons of exploding fuel to do it.

But at the moment, pipe dreams. We&#039;re a long way off that yet!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lora &#8211; </p>
<p>Cheers. 🙂 </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the challenge, yes. When space travel isn&#8217;t reliant on massive amounts of fossil fuels just to get off the ground, we&#8217;re onto a winner.</p>
<p>For that reason, I&#8217;m a big fan of the highly speculative &#8220;space elevator&#8221; concept, little more than solid science fiction at the moment but with a firm grounding in hard science &#8211; a mindboggling long cable connected to a large body in low orbit, so spacecraft don&#8217;t have to waste fuel getting out of Earth&#8217;s gravity well: </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator</a></p>
<p>When we have one of those, spacecraft can just be physically hauled up and we don&#8217;t need millions of tons of exploding fuel to do it.</p>
<p>But at the moment, pipe dreams. We&#8217;re a long way off that yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Brady</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/#comment-12527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Brady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=33828#comment-12527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[. . . .  And another thing.  Homo Sapiens are a part of Earth; we emerge from the very molecular structure of Earth.  We are not visitors who can just move to another galaxy far, far away.

Humans moving away from Sun to another star is absurd folly.  The Sooner we forget about it and start acting accordingly the better the chances are for our great grandchildren to survive to age 20.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>. . . .  And another thing.  Homo Sapiens are a part of Earth; we emerge from the very molecular structure of Earth.  We are not visitors who can just move to another galaxy far, far away.</p>
<p>Humans moving away from Sun to another star is absurd folly.  The Sooner we forget about it and start acting accordingly the better the chances are for our great grandchildren to survive to age 20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Brady</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/#comment-12525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Brady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=33828#comment-12525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naww.  Space is NOT worth it as we do it.  Our active space program has given us Spam (the meat kind), dangerous Teflon(TM) and Tang orange-style juice drink.  Oh, and also a whole lot of military technology that so far is fired at mostly brown people who live on top of our strategic oil reserves.

With the exception of the Hubble Telescope, perhaps nothing that we have built and shot into space should have been done.  Humanity cannot afford it and the US certainly can&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naww.  Space is NOT worth it as we do it.  Our active space program has given us Spam (the meat kind), dangerous Teflon(TM) and Tang orange-style juice drink.  Oh, and also a whole lot of military technology that so far is fired at mostly brown people who live on top of our strategic oil reserves.</p>
<p>With the exception of the Hubble Telescope, perhaps nothing that we have built and shot into space should have been done.  Humanity cannot afford it and the US certainly can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lora K.</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/space-why-bother/#comment-12423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lora K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=33828#comment-12423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Space is worth it. Even if there are imperfections to the way we go about studying space, that can be improved. The cost of not learning about it is too high. Imagine if someone said sea exploration wasn&#039;t worth it? Here&#039;s to hoping Branson and NASA / MIT etc. figure out a way to make space travel, exploration and studies totally green! Cheers (raises glass of rocket fuel to ya)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space is worth it. Even if there are imperfections to the way we go about studying space, that can be improved. The cost of not learning about it is too high. Imagine if someone said sea exploration wasn&#8217;t worth it? Here&#8217;s to hoping Branson and NASA / MIT etc. figure out a way to make space travel, exploration and studies totally green! Cheers (raises glass of rocket fuel to ya)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-02 21:45:46 by W3 Total Cache
-->