<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>formaldehyde &#8211; EcoSalon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/tag/formaldehyde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>EWG Sues FDA Over Inaction on Safety of Brazilian Blowout Ingredients</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill Ettinger]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Look Fabulous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formaldehyde]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=159533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>istock/milanmarkovic The Environmental Working Group (EWG), known for its “Dirty Dozen” and “Clean Fifteen” lists of pesticide residues on produce and its Skin Deep database ranking the safety of personal care ingredients, has filed a lawsuit against the FDA over what it says is a failure to act on issues surrounding popular hair-straightening keratin treatments&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/">EWG Sues FDA Over Inaction on Safety of Brazilian Blowout Ingredients</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_159534" style="width: 1254px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/"><img class="size-full wp-image-159534" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/iStock-483162228.jpg" alt="EWG Sues FDA Over Inaction on Safety of Brazilian Blowout Ingredients" width="1254" height="837" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2016/12/iStock-483162228.jpg 1254w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2016/12/iStock-483162228-625x417.jpg 625w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2016/12/iStock-483162228-768x513.jpg 768w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2016/12/iStock-483162228-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2016/12/iStock-483162228-600x400.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1254px) 100vw, 1254px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">istock<em>/</em>milanmarkovic</figcaption></figure>
<p><em>The Environmental Working Group (EWG), known for its “Dirty Dozen” and “Clean Fifteen” lists of pesticide residues on produce and its Skin Deep database ranking the safety of personal care ingredients, has filed a lawsuit against the FDA over what it says is a failure to act on issues surrounding popular hair-straightening keratin treatments known as the Brazilian Blowout.</em></p>
<p>According to EWG’s Scott Faber, the group&#8217;s senior vice president of government affairs, formaldehyde, which is present in the Brazilian Blowout products, is a known carcinogen.</p>
<p>The FDA is legally required to respond within a year of requests for an investigation into the safety of a product, Faber told CNN. But the agency has not moved according to the required timeline.</p>
<p>&#8220;[T]he petitioner can make the argument of undue delay,” Faber noted, “and that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re doing here.&#8221;</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>“For years stylists have reported that the application of these hair treatments caused difficulty breathing, eye irritation and nosebleeds,” Tina Sigurdson, EWG assistant general counsel, <a href="http://www.ewg.org/release/lawsuit-urges-fda-protect-salon-workers-consumers-formaldehyde" target="_blank">said in a statement.</a> “The FDA has been aware of the health hazards associated with the products since at least 2008. Despite these dangers, the FDA has yet to take action to remove them from the market.”</p>
<p>Warning letters were sent by the FDA to both Brazilian Blowout and Van Tibolli Beauty Corp., over what it cited as safety and labeling violations. A Van Tibolli spokesperson told CNN that it made label changes per the FDA’s request.</p>
<p>&#8220;People are aware that there&#8217;s methylene glycol in the product,&#8221; a Van Tibolli representative told CNN, &#8220;that&#8217;s one of the first things they learn about the ingredients.&#8221; Usually, customers communicate with the company a lot about how to use the products, but having learned this information from the start, they typically don&#8217;t complain.”</p>
<p>According to the Environmental Working Group’s website, formaldehyde, found in high levels of keratin hair straightening treatments, is both a potential allergen and known human carcinogen, putting customers and salon workers at risk for serious health issues. Heating the hair—an essential step in the application of keratin hair-straightening treatments, releases the formaldehyde into the air, making them more absorbable by the body and potentially more dangerous.</p>
<p>“The health risks posed by these products deserved immediate action from the FDA when it was brought to their attention in 2008,” Alexandra Scranton, director of science and research for Women’s Voices for the Earth, a fellow plaintiff in the suit, said in a statement on the EWG website. “Allowing salon workers and their customers to continue to be harmed by these products for over six years is unconscionable.”</p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><i>Find Jill on </i><a href="http://www.twitter.com/jillettinger"><i>Twitter</i></a><i> and </i><a href="http://www.instagram.com/jill_ettinger"><i>Instagram</i></a></span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><b>Related on Organic Authority</b></span></p>
<p class="p1"><a href="http://ecosalon.com/jennifer-aniston%e2%80%99s-hair-treatment-is-toxic/"><span class="s1">Brazilian Blowouts: Pretty Toxic, Actually<br />
</span></a><a href="http://ecosalon.com/6-steps-diy-cupping-therapy-clear-skin/"><span class="s1">6 Steps to DIY Cupping Therapy for Clear Skin<br />
</span></a><a href="http://ecosalon.com/how-to-straighten-your-hair/"><span class="s1">Tame Your Mane This Winter: How to Straighten Your Hair Without Damaging It</span></a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/">EWG Sues FDA Over Inaction on Safety of Brazilian Blowout Ingredients</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/ewg-sues-fda-over-inaction-on-safety-of-brazilian-blowout-ingredients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johnson &#038; Johnson Says &#8216;No More Formaldehyde&#8217; In Baby Shampoo</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Buczynski]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby shampoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formaldehyde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnson & johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no more tears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal care products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=143488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Under pressure from consumer groups, Johnson &#38; Johnson has finally begun to purge a potentially harmful chemical from its &#8220;No More Tears&#8221; baby products. You&#8217;d never knowingly scrub your child&#8217;s head with formaldehyde, yet for years a lack of label transparency at Johnson &#38; Johnson has allowed parents to do just that. See, for a long&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/">Johnson &#038; Johnson Says &#8216;No More Formaldehyde&#8217; In Baby Shampoo</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/johnson-johnson-no-more-tears.jpg"><a href="https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-143489" alt="johnson &amp; johnson no more tears" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/johnson-johnson-no-more-tears-455x303.jpg" width="455" height="303" /></a></a></p>
<p><em>Under pressure from consumer groups, Johnson &amp; Johnson has finally begun to purge a potentially harmful chemical from its &#8220;No More Tears&#8221; baby products.</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;d never knowingly scrub your child&#8217;s head with formaldehyde, yet for years a lack of label transparency at Johnson &amp; Johnson has allowed parents to do just that. See, for a long time the brand&#8217;s &#8220;No More Tears&#8221; baby shampoo products contained quaternium-15, a chemical preservative that releases formaldehyde as it ages. Yes, the amount of potential formaldehyde is very small and, yes, Johnson &amp; Johnson claims its safe for human use. But still, if you can make a product as important as baby shampoo without it, why wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the question asked by thousands of parents who petitioned the company to change its formula. And now, Johnson &amp; Johnson has finally agreed. According to the <a href="http://www.ewg.org/release/johnson-johnson-cleans-formaldehyde-out-baby-products-moving-adult-goods" target="_blank">Environmental Working Group</a>, which led the grassroots effort, the company has altered the formula of about 100 of its baby products to remove the quaternium-15, and reduced levels of 1,4 dioxane, which the federal government suspects to be <a href="http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/twelfth/profiles/Dioxane.pdf">carcinogenic</a>.</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>To its credit, Johnson &amp; Johnson also pledged to reformulate more of its wares by next year, including removing or limiting several other toxic chemicals in baby and adult products. Significantly, however, it is stopping short of removing all formaldehyde releasers from adult products. Instead, it said it would “avoid use of formaldehyde releasers in adult products whenever possible.”</p>
<p>Last year, Johnson &amp; Johnson told the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics that it had already removed <a href="http://ecosalon.com/7-beauty-ingredients-to-avoid-339/">phthalates</a>, potentially hazardous chemicals already banned in toys and products for babies. Unfortunately, the same can&#8217;t be said for many other personal care product and toy manufacturers.</p>
<p>Want to learn more about the brand&#8217;s efforts to reduce toxic chemicals? There&#8217;s a website for that. &#8220;Known as Our Safety &amp; Care Commitment, we created a website, <a href="http://www.safetyandcarecommitment.com/" target="_blank">www.safetyandcarecommitment.com</a>, dedicated to helping consumers better understand how we ensure the safety of beauty and baby care products and the ingredients that go into them. Consumers can view our ingredient policies and learn about the rigorous scientific standards of our five-level safety assurance process,&#8221; states a Johnson &amp; Johnson <a href="http://www.jnj.com/caring/citizenship-sustainability/strategic-framework/ingredient-safety" target="_blank">press release</a>.</p>
<p>NPR.org also has <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/08/15/158832173/johnson-johnson-pledges-to-purge-controversial-chemicals" target="_blank">a great chart</a> that breaks down the company&#8217;s new policies on baby and beauty products.</p>
<p><strong>Related on Ecosalon</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/behind-the-label-johnsons-baby-shampoo/">Behind The Label: Johnson&#8217;s Baby Shampoo</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/raise-zero-carbon-footprint-baby/">How To Raise A Zero Carbon Footprint Baby</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/unacceptable-levels-documentary/">Documentary Exposese 80K Chemicals in Everyday Products</a></p>
<p>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/criminalintent/2542777638/sizes/m/in/photolist-4SGpcL-5pn58Y-5L2xBy-6fReei-6oVgbZ-75pnic-75pnoZ-75tf1s-75xkwJ-7hQRda-7hUM1y-7hUNe1-8ppSid-8pmFEt-dxjEnN-dxjEo5-7GNQjn-b9KMU2-e3AzhL-e3uUkT-e3Azny-e3Az7q-e3uUJB-e3uUNp-8Bypus-82FPSz-b9KPhe-fQ6REH-e5s1AC-7XmqsL-8pmFu4-aWFgvZ-aMrvbk-cirgjd-dN669t-8sUseX-7P7PCt-7PbPs1/" target="_blank">criminalintent</a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/">Johnson &#038; Johnson Says &#8216;No More Formaldehyde&#8217; In Baby Shampoo</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/johnson-johnson-says-no-more-formaldehyde-in-baby-shampoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-04 16:55:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->