<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Getty &#8211; EcoSalon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/tag/getty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Getty Just Banned Retouched Images of Models</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abbie Stutzer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retouched images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=163220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>iStock/Joan Vicent Cantó Roig Getty is winning the realistic photography game. In late September, Getty Images announced that the company would ban retouched images of human bodies. The monumental announcement went into effect October 1, Dazed Digital reports, when the company changed the contracts for all photographers contributing work to its database. This change comes&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/">Getty Just Banned Retouched Images of Models</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_163234" style="width: 1183px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/"><img class="size-full wp-image-163234" src="https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116.jpg" alt="Getty Just Banned Retouched Images" width="1183" height="887" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116.jpg 1183w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116-625x469.jpg 625w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116-768x576.jpg 768w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116-800x600.jpg 800w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/2017/10/9b59b129-istock-619530116-600x450.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 1183px) 100vw, 1183px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text"><em>iStock/Joan Vicent Cantó Roig</em></figcaption></figure>
<p><em>Getty is winning the realistic <a href="http://ecosalon.com/hey-look-naked-celebrity-photos-and-that-time-bill-murray-and-i-swapped-spit/">photography</a> game.</em></p>
<p>In late September, Getty Images announced that the company would ban retouched images of human bodies.</p>
<p>The monumental announcement went into effect October 1, Dazed Digital reports, when the company changed the contracts for all photographers contributing work to its database. This change comes on the heels of the company’s promise that it would begin to diversify its stock <a href="http://ecosalon.com/acknowledging-eating-disorders-ending-excessive-photoshop-jobs-helps-but-isnt-the-answer/">imagery</a>.</p>
<p>Getty announced it made its decisions in an effort to not contribute to the plethora of airbrushed and retouched images people see every day. “Our perceptions of what is possible are often shaped by what we see: positive imagery can have direct impact on fighting stereotypes, creating tolerance, and empowering communities to feel represented in society,” Getty says.</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>“[We want to] change the way women and other marginalized communities are represented in media and advertising.”</p>
<h2>How Getty’s decision may effect people’s perception of “perfect”</h2>
<p>In general, people see Getty’s move as positive. Carolyn Karoll, LCSW-C at Karoll Counseling, LLC, thinks Getty’s shift could make an impact because of its size. Karoll also adds that the more images that exist that show women and men as they really are—with cellulite, bloat, and wrinkles—the more normalized this new standard will be.</p>
<p>“As more men and women struggle with body image, this giant step can start a valuable conversation on mental health and our responsibility as a society to promote realistic <a href="http://ecosalon.com/heartbeat-huang-qingjun-photographs-chinese-families-worldly-goods/">images</a> that showcase the world&#8217;s diversity,” adds Farrah Parker, branding consultant at FD Parker &amp; Associates.</p>
<h2>Getty and the industry</h2>
<p>Paul Cram, actor, thinks Getty’s move to provide un-retouched images may not be about inclusivity, but streamlining its business model. “I don&#8217;t believe that this change is reflective of an underlying concern for body image — I see this as a smart business move to [provide] images that have more flexibility (retouched or not) to buyers.” Cram also adds that in general, this move will not change the industry. People will continue to alter and retouch images if that “product” continues to sell.</p>
<p>On that note, Mike Peyzner, an experienced <a href="https://www.chocostudio.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">photographer</a>, adds that photography has benefited from photo “enhancement” techniques. But similar to anything, too much of a good thing is negative. “Highly retouched images bring an unrealistic standard. The industry is beginning to move in the direction of a more natural, less edited body type,” says Peyzner.</p>
<p>“Photography agencies will be more willing to create images that show what people actually look like without intensive Photoshop retouching.”</p>
<p>To that, we say <em>good</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Related on EcoSalon</strong><br />
<a href="http://ecosalon.com/instagram-photos-most-amazing-sunrise-pictures-of-2014/">Best Instagram Photos of the Week: The 33 Most Amazing First Sunrise Pictures of 2014</a><br />
<a href="http://ecosalon.com/4-photography-tips-taking-gorgeous-nature-photos/">4 Photography Tips for Taking Gorgeous Nature Photos</a><br />
<a href="http://ecosalon.com/facing-fear-national-geographic-photographer-leopard-seal/">Facing Fear: National Geographic Photographer Teaches us How in Scary Encounter with Leopard Seal (Video)</a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/">Getty Just Banned Retouched Images of Models</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/getty-just-banned-retouched-images-of-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-30 23:05:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->