<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GreenGov &#8211; EcoSalon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/tag/greengov/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Rays Redux: After 30 Years, White House Once Again Amps Up for Solar Power</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Adelson]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GreenGov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=59903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The White House is going solar (again). Two weeks ago, Nancy Sutley, chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, and Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced at a &#8220;GreenGov&#8221; symposium plans to install solar panels and a solar hot water heater on the roof of the executive residence next spring. This, they say, is &#8220;a project&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/">Rays Redux: After 30 Years, White House Once Again Amps Up for Solar Power</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/sunflag.jpg"><a href="https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-59904" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/sunflag.jpg" alt=- width="455" height="303" /></a></a></p>
<p>The White House is going solar (again). Two weeks ago, Nancy Sutley, chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, and Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced at a &#8220;<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/10/05/commitment-lead-solar-white-house" target="_blank">GreenGov</a>&#8221; symposium plans to install solar panels and a solar hot water heater on the roof of the executive residence next spring. This, they say, is &#8220;a project that demonstrates American solar technologies are available, reliable, and ready for installation in homes throughout the country.&#8221; Nice. But while the Obama administration&#8217;s promotion and support of alternative energy is encouraging, if not exactly aggressive, I&#8217;m reading these greening of the White House <a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/011652.html" target="_blank">stories</a> and am not sure whether to be encouraged or depressed. To be sure, this solar panel installation is a good thing. Likewise, it was a good thing four presidencies and three decades ago &#8211; when we did it the first time.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because we&#8217;re staring down the barrel, so to speak, of a 1994 redo; a tragic, almost identical backslide to the one that took place on the Hill in the midterms of 15-plus years ago. With this history repeating itself right now, the idea of traction on issues like solar power seems so fleeting. To wit, I bring you Jimmy Carter, who installed similar panels on the mansion to much fanfare in 1979.</p>
<p>It was a move supporting his energy policy, which he discussed in a famous televised <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/filmmore/ps_energy.html" target="_blank">speech</a> a few years prior: &#8220;Because we are now running out of gas and oil, we must prepare quickly for a third change, to strict conservation and to the use of coal and permanent renewable energy sources, like solar power.&#8221; he told us. &#8220;It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century.&#8221;</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>Ronald Reagan&#8217;s ascendancy put an end to that nonsense &#8211; immediately and completely. &#8220;The budget for the [Solar Energy Research] Institute &#8211; which President Jimmy Carter had created to spearhead solar innovation &#8211; was slashed [under Reagan] from $124 million in 1980 to $59 million in 1982. Scientists who had left tenured university jobs to work [on the project] were given two weeks&#8217; notice and no severance pay,&#8221; Arthur Allen wrote in <em><a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2000/03/prodigal-sun" target="_blank">Mother Jones</a></em> back in 2000, just months before another Big Oil president would take office. &#8220;By the end of 1985, when Congress and the administration allowed tax credits for solar homes to lapse, the dream of a solar era had faded&#8221;¦ Solar water heating went from a billion-dollar industry to peanuts overnight; thousands of sun-minded businesses went bankrupt.&#8221;</p>
<p>In 1986, when work was done to fix a leaky roof, President Reagan took down the panels. &#8220;By ripping the solar thermal (aka solar hot water) panels off the White House roof in the mid 80s to make a &#8220;˜statement&#8217; against alternative energy &#8211; and for oil &#8211; Reagan was instrumental in killing the U.S. solar thermal industry,&#8221; says <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/bio/lisa_margonelli.html" target="_blank">Lisa Margonelli</a>, Director of the Energy Productivity Initiative at the New America Foundation. Sadly, she <a href="http://www.politico.com/arena/archive/will-wh-solar-panels-help-president-obama.html" target="_blank">also informs us</a> that the Virginia company that made the White House panels was out of business by 1991.</p>
<p>So here we are again, more than a quarter of century later, and Obama&#8217;s repeat of Carter&#8217;s gesture leaves us to wonder where we would be today &#8220;if only.&#8221; Think about <em>30 years</em> of intensive, subsidized investment in solar power &#8211; or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power" target="_blank">wind</a>, for that matter. How different would our world be today? I&#8217;m not just talking about <a href="http://ecosalon.com/attributing-weather-events/" target="_blank">global warming</a> and environmental issues here. I&#8217;m talking about jobs. I&#8217;m talking about geopolitics. I&#8217;m talking about war and peace.</p>
<p>Ironically, as recent as last month, in an effort to avoid comparison to the ill-fated, one-term Carter administration, the Obama White House looked like it was about to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/sep/10/solar-panels-white-house" target="_blank">balk</a> at installing the panels. So the turnaround (albeit symbolic) this close to election time does indeed show some alternative energy chops.</p>
<p>I hope they&#8217;ll still be there in 2015.</p>
<p>Image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/walkadog/4125021158/" target="_blank">Beverly &amp; Pack</a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/">Rays Redux: After 30 Years, White House Once Again Amps Up for Solar Power</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/white-house-solar-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-02 21:22:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->