<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>women&#8217;s equality &#8211; EcoSalon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecosalon.com/tag/womens-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecosalon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>13 Women&#8217;s Bills That Every Woman Should be Aware Of</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Rogers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=133145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>No War on Women? Here are 13 bills and laws that say otherwise, and they&#8217;re just the tip of the iceberg. In 1912, women all over the United States marched for their right to vote. In 2012, we&#8217;re marching against state and federal laws that restrict our freedom to make decisions about our own bodies,&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/">13 Women&#8217;s Bills That Every Woman Should be Aware Of</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-133148" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/war-on-women.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="355" /></a></p>
<p><em>No War on Women? Here are 13 bills and laws that say otherwise, and they&#8217;re just the tip of the iceberg.</em></p>
<p>In 1912, women all over the United States marched for their right to vote. In 2012, we&#8217;re marching against state and federal laws that restrict our freedom to <a href="http://ecosalon.com/barely-legal/">make decisions about our own bodies</a>, make it easy for abusers to get away with physically assaulting us and fail to grant us the equal pay that we deserve.</p>
<p>Why are we still fighting this hard 100 years later? Because efforts to keep us &#8220;in our place&#8221; haven&#8217;t stopped. The official Republican party line on the War on Women is that it isn&#8217;t happening. It&#8217;s all in our heads. But there are bills popping up all over the nation like the heads of a hydra that prove otherwise. Sometimes, the bills don&#8217;t pass. But when they don&#8217;t, those same legislators &#8211; or successors with the same ideals &#8211; are ready to try to ram them through again… and again… and again. Here are 13 of the most egregious examples.</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p><strong>1. GOP Attempts to Redefine Rape for the Purposes of Abortion Law</strong></p>
<p>Was it &#8220;rape rape&#8221; or just &#8220;kinda rape&#8221; because House Republicans draw a distinction, claiming that &#8220;real rape&#8221; involves the use of force. All those other kinds of rape &#8211; as in date rape, statutory rape, rapes of women with limited mental capacity or any sexual assault in which a woman is not fully conscious &#8211; don&#8217;t count as reasons to get an abortion using federal funds in the GOP&#8217;s &#8220;No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.&#8221; The House Republican Majority really, seriously tried to redefine rape to rule out federal assistance for abortions in many cases. <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/republican-plan-redefine-rape-abortion">Mother Jones provides an example</a> of how this could play out: say a 13-year-old girl is impregnated by a 24-year-old man. It wasn&#8217;t forcible, but at 13, she can&#8217;t legally consent to sex &#8211; it&#8217;s rape, plain and simple. She wouldn&#8217;t qualify for Medicaid to pay for an abortion. The bill would also forbid using tax benefits to pay for abortions, so that girl&#8217;s parents wouldn&#8217;t be able to use money from a tax-exempt health savings account (HSA) to pay for the procedure, either.</p>
<p>The House GOP ultimately stripped this controversial language from the bill, but then used a committee report to claim that the bill would not allow funding for abortions in cases of statutory rape. The bill passed the House in May 2011, but is not expected to pass in the Senate, if it even comes up for a vote.</p>
<p><strong>2. United States Violence Against Women Act Fails LGBT, Native Women</strong></p>
<p>Democrats and Republicans in the United States Congress have at least been able to agree that women should be protected from abuse. But which women? That&#8217;s the question that has held up the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57437553/violence-against-women-act-hits-snag-in-congress/">Violence Against Women Act </a>for months. In April, the Senate passed the Democrat version of the bill, which extends protection to LGBT, Native American and illegal immigrant women, all of whose complaints about violence often get overlooked. But House Republicans stripped these protections from their own version of the bill, and now the two branches of government are at an impasse. Republicans are actually claiming that protecting all women from violence is an election year stunt, singling out specific groups for special treatment.</p>
<p><strong>3. United States House of Representatives Votes to Let Women Die</strong></p>
<p>They called it the Protect Life Act, but the bill that was passed in November 2011 bans the use of federal funds to cover the costs of any health plan that covers abortion &#8211; even in life-threatening situations. This simple fact led opponents of the bill to give it the far more appropriate nickname of the<a href="http://jezebel.com/5849839/house-passes-let-women-die-bill-after-extremely-depressing-debate"> &#8220;Let Women Die&#8221; bill.</a> The bilk obtains a provision that would allow hospitals receiving federal subsidies to refuse to treat women seeking abortions, no matter the circumstances. During the House of Representatives floor debate, Rep. Jackie Speier of California <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/13/protect-life-act-passes-house-of-representatives_n_1009876.html">described in detail her own painful experience</a>, demonstrating why abortions should be covered. &#8220;I was pregnant, I was miscarrying, I was bleeding… if I had to go from one hospital to the next trying to find one emergency room that would take me in, who knows if I would even be here today.&#8221;</p>
<p>What makes this even more frustrating is the fact that President Obama&#8217;s Affordable Care Act already keeps public federal funds separate from the private funds that cover abortion. What this bill is attempting to do is prevent women from buying private health insurance that includes abortion coverage through a state health care exchange. The bill is unlikely to pass in the Senate however, and President Obama has said that he&#8217;ll veto it if it ever reaches his desk.</p>
<p><strong>4. Arizona Outlaws Abortion After 20 Weeks</strong></p>
<p>Well, if the United States Government doesn&#8217;t succeed in letting women die, then by golly, Arizona will do it for them, at least on a state-wide scale. Arizona&#8217;s federal court <a href="http://www.aclu.org/reproductive-freedom/court-upholds-most-extreme-and-dangerous-abortion-ban-nation">upheld the most extreme abortion ban in the country</a> in July 2012, criminalizing virtually all abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, forcing physicians to wait until women are actually dying before they can offer life-saving care. It even bans abortions in cases where the fetus will not survive after birth, prolonging agony by forcing parents to carry pregnancies to full term and then literally watch their babies die.</p>
<p>The law flouts a Supreme Court ruling that states can&#8217;t ban abortion before viability, the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb, which is about 24 weeks gestation. And another problem is the fact that many severe fetal abnormalities and risks to a woman&#8217;s life don&#8217;t occur until beyond that point. Judge James Teilborg gave in to the totally non-scientific assertion that 20-week fetuses can feel pain, ignoring the obvious fact that women can feel pain, and plenty of it.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the bitter icing on the cake: the bill considers the starting point of pregnancy to begin on the first day of the mother&#8217;s last menstrual period, <a href="http://rt.com/usa/news/abortion-arizona-law-brewer-003/">before life is even scientifically possible</a>. That means women hitting the 20-week mark are actually only 18 weeks pregnant.</p>
<p><strong>5. GOP Cuts Crucial Services for Low-Income Women and Children</strong></p>
<p>House Republicans <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/30/opinion/a-cruel-republican-budget.html">voted for a new budget</a> that would drastically cut food, shelter and health care services for millions of struggling families, singling out low-income women in particular. $3.3 million would be cut from low-income programs over 10 years, which would lead to states dumping an estimated 14 million to 28 million people from Medicaid rosters. The bill, which Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney called &#8220;a bold and exciting effort,&#8221; would also either disqualify 8 million of the 47 million people in the food stamp program or cut the benefits for all of them, leading to a loss of about $90 worth of food per month for a family of four. Small victory for common sense: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/16/house-gop-budget-plan-senate_n_1522393.html">the bill was rejected by the Senate in May.</a></p>
<p><strong>6. Repeated Attempts to Ban Federal Funding of Planned Parenthood</strong></p>
<p>Whew. That didn&#8217;t pass, so everything is okay, right? Of course not. Congress is still battling against a women&#8217;s right to make decisions about her own health &#8211; including use of contraception, something that should be a complete non-issue in 21st century America. Republicans in Congress<a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/223027/20110930/planned-parenthood-npr-funding-house-of-representatives.htm"> repeatedly attempt to defund or eliminate Planned Parenthood</a> and other organizations that provide low-cost health care to millions of low-income women around the world. Paternalistic religious imperatives to restrict abortion and birth control are <a href="http://www.politicususa.com/birth-control-low-income-women.html">having a very direct, real-life effect</a>: women are being deprived of cancer screenings, AIDS/HIV testing, family planning information and other education services that could reduce health care problems and prevent unplanned pregnancies from occurring in the first place. 76% of Planned Parenthood&#8217;s clients have incomes at or below 150% of the federal poverty level. And when Congress doesn&#8217;t succeed, states are ready to take up the cause in their stead.</p>
<p><strong>7. South Dakota Forces Doctors to Claim that Abortion Increases Suicide Rates</strong></p>
<p>In July, an appeals court upheld a South Dakota law that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/24/south-dakota-abortion-suidice-law-appeals-court_n_1699615.html">requires doctors to recite anti-abortion propaganda </a>to patients seeking to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Doctors are forced to tell women that abortions are linked to higher suicide rates &#8211; information that&#8217;s not based on reliable research. A 2008 John Hopkins review of the studies that claim the link between abortion and suicide concluded that even the highest quality studies on the subject showed no discernible differences in the mental health of women who&#8217;d had abortions and those who had not.</p>
<p>Women who want an abortion in South Dakota also face the longest waiting period in the nation (3 days), and are forced to undergo counseling at pregnancy centers that discourage abortions. But wait &#8211; it gets worse. South Dakota <a href="http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=12869">nearly made it legal to kill abortion doctors</a>. State legislators sought to modify a &#8220;justifiable homicide&#8221; law to include killings that aimed to prevent harm to an unborn child, a provision that would have basically enabled people to murder abortion providers and get away with it. That bill was, thankfully, struck down.</p>
<p><strong>8. Colorado Permits Private Businesses to Withhold Contraception</strong></p>
<p>In Colorado, a small manufacturer of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment decided that providing its employees with health insurance plans that cover contraception &#8211; as required by the Obama administration&#8217;s new healthcare laws &#8211; violated its religious liberty. As in, its &#8220;right&#8221; to discriminate against women in the name of the owners&#8217; religion. Sounds like an outrageous request that goes against the United States Constitution, does it not? But a federal court in Colorado disagrees. <a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/reproductive-freedom-religion-belief/courts-ruling-allow-employer-discriminate-out-step">An exception was made for this business, </a>Hercules Industries, that could pave the way for employers all over the country to impose their religious views on their employees.</p>
<p>Hercules Industries, owned by Catholics, was granted a three-month temporary injunction allowing for further legal review of the case. Two similar lawsuits have been filed in Michigan and Missouri. The companies all claim that the law forces the owners to go against their religious beliefs forbidding the use of contraceptives. But as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) points out, this could pave the way for employers making decisions about health procedures like vaccinations and blood transfusions based on their own personal religious beliefs.</p>
<p>Mitt Romney, by the way, cheered for this ruling as well, in typically chilling privileged-conservative-male fashion. &#8220;Today&#8217;s injunction preventing the federal government from forcing one family business from having to choose between keeping its doors open and violating its faith is a step in the right direction. But it is only a step, not the end of the struggle. We must ensure that the same freedom to live according to one&#8217;s faith is available to all Americans.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>9. Wisconsin Equal Pay Enforcement Act Repealed</strong></p>
<p>Think women don&#8217;t deserve to be paid less than men simply by virtue of being born female? Oh, you silly little lady (or radically feminized man, i.e. traitor). How wrong you are &#8211; according to Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, who <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77069.html">quietly repealed his state&#8217;s equal pay law </a>in April 2012. The 2009 Equal Pay Enforcement Act gave women more avenues through which to press charges against employers for gender-based pay discrimination. In Wisconsin, women earn 75 cents for every dollar that men make (compared to the national average of 77 cents, which obviously isn&#8217;t much better.) A bill to roll back the provision passed Republican-controlled chambers of the state government before Walker put his signature on it, without informing the public of his actions.</p>
<p><strong>10. Senate Republicans Block Paycheck Fairness Act</strong></p>
<p>On the federal level, an effort by Senate Democrats to strengthen the 45-year-old Equal Pay Act failed in June 2012. The Paycheck Fairness Act would have required employers to show that wage differences between the sexes are job-related, not gender-based. It would also protect women from retaliation from their employers when seeking equal pay. The bill was previously defeated in 2010 by solid Republican opposition.</p>
<p><strong>11. Virginia Requires Invasive Vaginal Ultrasounds Before Abortion</strong></p>
<p>So you want an abortion, citizen of Virginia? Well, we&#8217;re going to have to violate you with an unwanted, medically unnecessary vaginal ultrasound just to make sure. That&#8217;s the message that Virginia Republicans sent to women when they <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/22/430032/virginia-governor-backs-off-state-sponsored-rape-ultrasound-bill-promises-review-measure/">attempted to pass a law requiring transvaginal ultrasounds</a> prior to obtaining an abortion, an amazing invasion of women&#8217;s bodies (literally) that aimed to shame them out of their decision. The state&#8217;s Republican Governor, Bob McDonnell, originally supported the measure, an ironic position given his squeamishness over TSA pat-downs in airports. Ultimately, he backed down &#8211; sort of. While women are still required to have an ultrasound procedure before an abortion, they can choose an abdominal ultrasound over the dildo-like transvaginal apparatus.</p>
<p><strong>12. House GOP Tries to Block Abortions &#8216;Motivated by Racism or Sexism&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>But wait, there&#8217;s more! Alabama and Pennsylvania are both considering similar ultrasound requirements, and the U.S. House GOP <a href="http://jezebel.com/5914519/house-votes-today-on-bill-making-it-illegal-to-be-racist-or-sexist-against-your-fetus">tried to pass a bill</a> that would have allowed a woman&#8217;s spouse to obtain a court-ordered block against having an abortion by <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/05/house-gop-abortion-sex-selection">accusing her of wanting to end her pregnancy due to racism or sexism</a>. Because all of those smug white guys in Congress are so concerned about sexism.</p>
<p><strong>13. Alabama Personhood Bill Declares Fertilized Eggs to be People</strong></p>
<p>So let&#8217;s get this straight: fertilized eggs, according to Alabama legislators, are people with rights. But women &#8211; over half the population of actual people in the world &#8211; are being stripped of their own rights in favor of bits of biological matter that are not, scientifically people. Alabama is actually <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/07/05/511421/radical-personhood-initiatives-fail-in-states-across-the-country/?mobile=nc">just one of many states</a> including Nevada, Oklahoma, Virginia, Florida, Pennsylvania, Colorado and Mississippi that have introduced bills attempting to define the start of human life. The Alabama bill <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/18/state-abortion-laws_n_1684825.html">defines life as beginning at the moment of conception</a>, a concept that would not only make all abortion illegal even when the pregnancy threatens a woman&#8217;s life, but would also outlaw contraceptives like birth control pills and IUDs. This bill, along with another that would allow the state to opt out of providing health insurance for abortions under the new federal health care law, is currently stalled in committee. The personhood initiatives in most of the other states have failed, but classifying a fertilized egg as a person will be up for vote in Colorado in the November election.</p>
<p>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/progressohio/5880679051/">ProgressOhio</a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/">13 Women&#8217;s Bills That Every Woman Should be Aware Of</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/13-womens-bills-that-every-woman-should-be-aware-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Ways the World Still Tries to Rule Women&#8217;s Bodies</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Rogers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=114792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Be pure. Be sexy. Be a nurturer. Don&#8217;t breastfeed in public. Messages to women are more conflicted than ever. We live in an advanced era of cloud computing, virtual personal assistants and cars that can parallel park themselves. So why is it that women so often feel like we&#8217;re still living in the dark ages?&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/">10 Ways the World Still Tries to Rule Women&#8217;s Bodies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-114797" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/womens-bodies-1.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="326" /></a></p>
<p><em>Be pure. Be sexy. Be a nurturer. Don&#8217;t breastfeed in public. Messages to women are more conflicted than ever.</em></p>
<p>We live in an advanced era of cloud computing, virtual personal assistants and cars that can parallel park themselves. So why is it that women so often feel like we&#8217;re still living in the dark ages? The question of whether we should even have access to birth control is still a part of our everyday political discourse. Fathers are symbolically claiming their daughters&#8217; virginity. We&#8217;re slammed with objectifying ads that tell us to be more sexy, then shamed for claiming our sexual identities. And perhaps the saddest part of all is that it isn&#8217;t just men who are forcing these forms of suppression and control onto women&#8217;s bodies; the pressure comes from other women, too.</p>
<p><strong>Purity pledges</strong></p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>Young girls are such delicate, corruptible little flowers that their wise, protective fathers must not only rule their sexuality with an iron fist, but demand that their daughters <em>pledge their virginity to them</em>. So goes the rationale of the<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1823930,00.html"> Purity Ball movement</a>, engineered largely by Christian fathers as a means of control over their progeny&#8217;s blossoming bodies.</p>
<p>What makes this even more disturbing is the fact that these girls are not making this decision for themselves at puberty (and even then, they&#8217;re too young to realize just what their fathers are asking of them.) Girls are brought to their first Purity Ball at the age of five, where they prance around in white dresses, listen to sermons about living a &#8220;pure life&#8221; and pledge themselves to their fathers. Throughout childhood and adolescence, the girls are given ominous warnings of the &#8220;terrible consequences&#8221; of losing their virginity, and essentially told that they have no input on their own burgeoning sexual identities at all. Many girls receive lock charms on necklaces, the keys held by their fathers, who will pass them over to their husbands on their wedding day in a transfer of male power.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s no equivalent movement that attempts to force young men into pledging their virginity to their mothers. Because that would just be weird.</p>
<p><strong>Virginity tests</strong></p>
<p>Taking control over young women&#8217;s vaginas to a far greater extreme, <a href="http://www.genderacrossborders.com/2011/06/10/political-control-and-womens-bodies-the-egyptian-virginity-tests">virginity tests </a>are the literal examination of a woman&#8217;s hymen to be sure that she hasn&#8217;t had sex before marriage. These tests are illegal in many countries, and Amnesty International classifies them as torture. That doesn&#8217;t stop them from happening all over the world, both in institutional and private settings. Some cultures require that brides-to-be undergo such a test before their wedding day. Last year in Egypt, female protesters were subjected to them by military authorities; <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/05/30/egypt.virginity.tests/?hpt=T2">an official explained</a> &#8220;We didn&#8217;t want them to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove that they weren&#8217;t virgins in the first place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because if they aren&#8217;t virgins, clearly they&#8217;re asking for it.</p>
<p>Think this practice is long gone in the west? The British government used virginity testing for young female immigrants until 1979, believing that if they were virgins, they were more likely to be telling the truth about moving to Britain for marriage.</p>
<p><strong>Gender segregation</strong></p>
<p>Women are told to sit at the back of the bus &#8211; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/nyregion/bus-segregation-of-jewish-women-prompts-review.html">in Brooklyn</a>. In Israel&#8217;s Beit Shemesh, a growing sect of powerful ultra-Orthodox extremists are fighting to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/world/middleeast/israel-faces-crisis-over-role-of-ultra-orthodox-in-society.html?pagewanted=all">keep women separate</a> from men in nearly all public settings, even preventing women from going to the podium to accept their rightfully earned prizes at an awards ceremony. In many other areas of the world, the segregation of men and women has been going on for so long, and is so deeply entrenched in local culture, that changing it seems like an impossible task. The problem is particularly troubling in Islamic cultures, where fundamentalists place strict limits on interaction between women and men who aren&#8217;t their relatives.</p>
<p>In many cases, the reasoning behind segregating women from men is preserving the &#8220;virtue&#8221; of women and the &#8220;honor&#8221; of men, the idea being that women are not only helpless against the temptation of jumping on any random men who cross their paths, but that the mere sight of women could corrupt and distract men who are supposed to be focusing on more important things. It also reinforces the idea of women as property, who must be governed by male overlords.</p>
<p><strong>Reproductive rights</strong></p>
<p>Our supposedly progressive president <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/obama-administration-refuses-to-relax-plan-b-restrictions/2011/12/07/gIQAF5HicO_story.html">refused to relax restrictions</a> on Plan B, preventing women of all ages from accessing the morning-after pill directly off drugstore and supermarket shelves. Our legislators threaten to cave to fringe groups that want to <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/06/03/235552/personhood-bills-attack-contraception/">redefine life</a> as beginning at the moment of fertilization, which would outlaw all contraceptives, including birth control pills. One of our Republican presidential nominees, Rick Santorum, not only believes that birth control <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/rick_santorum_is_coming_for_your_birth_control/">damages society</a>, but wants to make <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/rick-santorum-abortion-rape_n_1224624.html">all abortions illegal</a>, even in the case of rape or incest, saying women should &#8220;make the best of a bad situation.&#8221; A bill in Georgia <a href="http://ecosalon.com/legislating-misogyny-miscarriage-could-now-become-a-crime-really-004/">proposed the persecution</a> of women who couldn&#8217;t prove that they didn&#8217;t cause their own miscarriages.</p>
<p>In other nations around the world, women&#8217;s ability to make choices about their own bodies and lives are in even more desperate straits. Women are all too often seen as passive baby-making machines, essentially existing only to further the continuation of the species.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-114794" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/womens-bodies-2.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="353" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/womens-bodies-2.jpg 455w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/womens-bodies-2-300x232.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 455px) 100vw, 455px" /></p>
<p><strong>Breastfeeding brouhaha</strong></p>
<p>Breasts are so sexy &#8211; except when you&#8217;re feeding your baby. Then, they&#8217;re just gross. So gross that people will go out of their way to yell at mothers trying to provide her infant with the best sustenance in the world, and shame them into hiding. The problem is, society at large only wants to think of breasts in a sexual context; we&#8217;re so far removed from the biological realities of our species that many people feel disturbed by the sight of a baby suckling. Some <a href="http://blog.chron.com/babysteps/2007/06/breast-feeding-in-public-and-other-debates/">honestly believe</a> that women only breastfeed in public because they&#8217;re exhibitionists or trying to make a statement, not because their babies are hungry. Some even view it as pornographic. It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs when a mother is told that a dirty public restroom is a more appropriate place to feed her baby than a table at a restaurant.</p>
<p><strong>The great cover-up</strong></p>
<p>In Saudi Arabia, women who are already shrouded from head to toe in impenetrable layers of cloth, even in the harsh heat of the desert, are being told to <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/11/Saudi-women-may-be-forced-to-cover-up-sexy-eyes--567404/1">cover up their sexy eyes</a>. If a man decides that a certain woman has eyes that are too &#8220;tempting,&#8221; he has the right to order her to cover them immediately lest she face fines or public lashings. In Israel, the same extremists segregating the sexes are <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/28/israel-fighting-for-the-soul-of-the-nation-against-ultra-orthodox-segregationist-zealots/">spitting on little girls</a> who are dressed &#8220;too provocatively&#8221; as they walk to school. There are even <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/article/the-great-cover-up">movements within America</a> to return to some misguided Victorian celebration of modesty. Women have come a long way since the days when they could be institutionalized just for having a bad reputation, but they&#8217;re still treated as if their bodies are weapons with which they might accidentally (or intentionally) bring ruin upon themselves and the men who look their way.</p>
<p><strong>Slut shaming and rape blaming</strong></p>
<p>Well, if you don&#8217;t cover up, don&#8217;t expect anyone to feel sorry for you when you get raped. That&#8217;s the message that&#8217;s foisted upon us by modesty advocates and other groups who argue that showing virtually any skin equates to inviting violent sexual assault. And if you dare to claim your own identity as a sexual being, you should be ashamed of yourself. <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/150473/slut_shame%3A_attacking_women_for_their_sex_lives">Slut-shaming</a> has everything to do with patriarchal directives for women &#8211; how we should dress, how we should act, how we should conduct our sex lives. If we don&#8217;t conform, and especially if we dare to be aggressive about our sexuality, we&#8217;re ridiculed. Men, on the other hand, get a free pass &#8211; the more frequent and public their conquests, the more admiration and approval they gain.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-114793" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/womens-bodies-3.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="335" /></p>
<p><strong>Objectification</strong></p>
<p>On the other side of the coin is the duality of expectations on female roles in society, specifically the wife versus the mistress, the modest and nurturing woman who is practically asexual versus the sex object that only exists for the pleasure of others. Both roles objectify women by removing their personalities and individuality. Sexual objectification is much more in-your-face, pushed on women every day by the mass media, treating women like commodities to be ogled and traded. For all of the pressure to be chaste there&#8217;s an equal opposing force pressuring women to be vapid, fleshly blow-up dolls. A prime example is a <a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1513153/abercrombie-pulls-tshirts-after-girls-boycott.jhtml">t-shirt</a> offered by Abercrombie and Fitch (the same store hawking <a href="http://www.stylecaster.com/fashion/11984/abercrombie-thinks-7-year-olds-chest-needs-lift">push-up bras for kids</a>) emblazoned with the slogan, &#8220;With These, Who Needs Brains?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Lesbian torture clinics</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that homosexuality, another basic biological reality of our species, is seen by certain groups as something to be &#8220;cured.&#8221; But your jaw might just drop in horror when you learn that some of these &#8220;cure clinics&#8221; use physical torture and psychological abuse in an attempt to &#8220;straighten out&#8221; queer women. Ecuadorian activists are speaking out about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/emilia-gutierrez/ecuador-lesbian-torture-clinics_b_1087533.html">200 torture clinics</a> operating under the guise of rehabilitation centers where both men and women are shackled, starved and sexually abused. Thankfully, a <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/ecuador-minister-of-health-close-remaining-ex-gay-torture-clinics-in-ecuador">Change.org petition</a> has brought about the beginning of the end to this practice in Ecuador, but we&#8217;re all too aware that there are still plenty of other groups across the globe that want to dictate who you can and can&#8217;t have sex with.</p>
<p><strong>Female genital mutilation</strong></p>
<p>Circumcision is a touchy issue, even here in America where it&#8217;s routinely performed on baby boys. Delve into the sticky cultural context of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/27/female_genital_mutilation_bill/">female circumcision</a> as it&#8217;s practiced in Africa, and you&#8217;re opening a whole other can of worms. Some African feminists <a href="http://jezebel.com/328601/african-doctor-is-female-circumcision-so-awful">maintain</a> that female genital mutilation is part of their cultural heritage, and one that &#8220;first world feminists&#8221; have no right to condemn &#8211; just as Jewish and Muslim traditions dictate that <a href="http://ecosalon.com/pomp-and-circumcision/">circumcision</a> is a must for boys. But many woomen can&#8217;t help but feel that these practices were designed to control women by robbing them of sexual pleasure. Can you imagine a cut to your unanesthetized clitoris as anything other than torture? This is controlling other people&#8217;s bodies to the extreme, and truth be told, maybe we should leave everybody&#8217;s genitals alone and let them decide what they want to do with them once they reach adulthood.</p>
<p>Photos: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/progressohio/5881239930/">progress ohio</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tim_and_selena/539977839/">tim &amp; selena middleton</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rutlo/4546246323/">rutlo</a></p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/">10 Ways the World Still Tries to Rule Women&#8217;s Bodies</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/10-ways-the-world-still-tries-to-rule-womens-bodies-feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Friday 5: The New Feminists Edition</title>
		<link>https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/</link>
		<comments>https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy DuFault]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15 feminist all stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 Ridiculous Laws Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy DuFault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrea Newell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Brones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best feminist websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EcoSalon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libby Lowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss Representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWN network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[womens rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecosalon.com/?p=100993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new feminism is raging in America and the modern woman is embracing it. Marketing Manager Anna Brones and I were busy doing what we do at EcoSalon when I pinged her: &#8220;Are we becoming in your face feminists?&#8221; Anna shot me back: &#8220;What are we supposed to do? Not be feminists?&#8221; It got me&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/">The Friday 5: The New Feminists Edition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/536.jpg"><a href="https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/"><img class="size-full wp-image-100995 alignnone" title="5" src="http://ecosalon.com/wp-content/uploads/536.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="455" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/536.jpg 455w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/536-150x150.jpg 150w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/536-300x300.jpg 300w, https://storage.googleapis.com/wpesc/1/536-415x415.jpg 415w" sizes="(max-width: 455px) 100vw, 455px" /></a></a></p>
<p><em>A new feminism is raging in America and the modern woman is embracing it.<br />
</em></p>
<p>Marketing Manager Anna Brones and I were busy doing what we do at EcoSalon when I pinged her:</p>
<p>&#8220;Are we becoming in your face feminists?&#8221;</p><div id="inContentContiner"><!-- /4450967/ES-In-Content -->
    <div id="div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0">
    <script type="text/javascript">
    googletag.cmd.push(function() {
      googletag.display("div-gpt-ad-1430927735854-0");
      googletag.pubads().refresh([adslot4]);
    });
    </script>
    </div>

    <!-- ES-In-Content
		<script type="text/javascript">
		GA_googleFillSlot("ES-In-Content");
		</script>--></div>
<p>Anna shot me back: &#8220;What are we supposed to do? Not be feminists?&#8221;</p>
<p>It got me thinking, why does feminism have a bad name?</p>
<p>After a while Anna sent another message: &#8220;As women, we have to rally together because we have no choice and it&#8217;s not because we hate men. I also think it&#8217;s bullshit that as soon as we start talking about women and rallying together we quickly get attacked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Her comments stayed with me on Tuesday when a female neighbor talked feverishly about a female DPW worker who needed to &#8220;stop wearing her cutesie heels and skirt and be a man,&#8221; so she could get things done.</p>
<p>Her comments stayed with me on Thursday when a friend said &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to wear lipstick to the supermarket to call attention to myself.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could go on. I bet you could too. Here are five more stories that should clearly show you, in 2011, women are still not out of the woods as equal members of society.</p>
<p>Fact. In the U.S., women still <a title="Catalyst: Statistical Overview of Women in the Workplace" href="http://www.catalyst.org/publication/219/statistical-overview-of-women-in-the-workplace" target="_blank">hold only </a>14.4 percent of executive officer seats and 15.7 percent of board seats in Fortune 500 companies. Why is that? You <em>could</em> blame it on life, women having babies and leaving the work force but you also could blame it on &#8220;Good Girl&#8221; syndrome. In her story <a href="http://ecosalon.com/women-learn-how-to-fail-at-work-in-grade-school/">Women Learn How to Fail at Work in Grade School</a>, Andrea Newell, Senior Editor at EcoSalon says &#8220;After spending their formative years of learning the &#8216;nice&#8217; girl code of behavior, women discover that the workplace demands different behavior and has a new set of rules.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes you have to scratch your head and wonder what century we&#8217;re living in. Could it be possible that in 2011, women are still fighting for the right to choose? In her article <a href="http://ecosalon.com/barely-legal/">Barely Legal</a>, writer Libby Lowe talks about <a title="Cecile Richards Responds" href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/statement-cecile-richards-president-planned-parenthood-federation-america-tax-implications-hr-3-36496.htm" target="_blank">H.R.3</a>, a bill known for finally defining rape as “forcible.” Lowe says the bill is now aimed at punishing women and private insurers who provide coverage for rape victim abortion. &#8220;And, as if your taxes aren’t complicated enough, if H.R.3 passes, the IRS will be looking to get in your pants. &#8216;Under standard audit procedure, a woman would have to provide evidence to corroborate facts about abortions, rapes, and cases of incest.'&#8221; Hello Big Brother.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://ecosalon.com/the-top-15-feminist-film-stars/">The Top 15 Feminist All Stars</a>, we get a Hollywood breakdown of strong actresses who have played kick ass women in supporting and lead roles.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://missrepresentation.org/">Miss Representation</a> </em>is a documentary that explores the misrepresentation of women in culture and media and how that influences the <em>under</em> representation of women in other realms, like politics and business. In an interview with the film’s writer and producer, Jennifer Siebel Newsom says &#8220;It’s sort of a chicken and the egg, both the media and our culture don’t value women enough,” she says. That leads to an image that, as Siebel Newsom puts it, is &#8220;disparaging and hyper-sexualized and ultimately relays to the culture that that’s what women are.” Miss Representation aired just this past week on the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN).</p>
<p>So, today, at this very moment, if you were to go out in Tucson, Arizona, you couldn&#8217;t wear a pair of pants. Nope. Not kidding. A real law in the city. Who knows what happens to women who defy it, but in <a href="http://ecosalon.com/7-stupid-laws-against-women/">7 Ridiculous Laws Against Women</a>, we get a pretty traumatizing look at backwards places still holding true to women being the lesser sex.</p>
<p>And for these injustices we have to laugh and cry at the same time.</p>
</p><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/">The Friday 5: The New Feminists Edition</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://ecosalon.com">EcoSalon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://ecosalon.com/the-friday-5-the-new-feminists-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced 

Served from: ecosalon.com @ 2025-11-04 22:50:48 by W3 Total Cache
-->